Today we are going to talk about valuation in business continuity arrangements. Business continuity arrangements must cover both lifetime and death events. Your challenge (and that of your advisors) is to establish a valuation that is consistent for both events.
Today we are going to talk about valuation in business continuity arrangements. Business continuity arrangements must cover both lifetime and death events. Your challenge (and that of your advisors) is to establish a valuation that is consistent for both events.
As a general Exit Planning principle, we assign the lowest defensible value on a company except when we anticipate a sale to an outside third party for cash.
Unless you (the owner) anticipate selling to an outside party for cash, you will receive much of payment for your ownership interest in the form of deferred compensation, rental income, etc. The value of your stock (for tax reasons) will be minimized.
Expect to see your advisors employ this same concept when they design the transfer at death provisions in your buy-sell agreement. Why? First, the IRS does not look kindly on two different valuations of the same business interest: one high (because life insurance is funding the buy-out), and one low (designed to avoid the double tax consequences of a lifetime purchase of stock). Therefore, we create consistency by using the lowest defensible value for both life and death transfers.
How does this apply to a "real" situation?
Curly and Moe were two equal owners of a business—one that could possibly be sold to an outside third party for $5 million. Because one of Curly’s objectives was to leave the business and transfer his ownership interest to Moe (and/or a group of key employees including Larry and Shemp), the more tax-efficient design would be to sell the Curly’s interest at the lowest defensible value and have him receive a significant part of the cash through the direct receipt of future income.
To achieve that goal, we typically use non-qualified deferred compensation plans, royalty and licensing fees, and increased rental fees (with respect to real property or equipment rented or leased to the company). These tactics serve both to reduce the value of the business (because they create financial obligations on the part of the business) and to provide a justifiable reason to pay money directly to Curly after he leaves the business.
Should Curly die before his lifetime exit begins, (or is complete), Moe would probably want to receive $2.5 million dollars for Curly’s ownership interest rather than the lower value used to reduce income tax consequences on that lifetime sale.
The difference between the lifetime value Curly is entitled to and the total amount of money he wants for his family (if he dies) can be made up if Curly acquires life insurance on his life for the difference between what Moe must pay him and what Curly wants for his family. That insurance must be owned outside of Curly’s estate (perhaps in a revocable life insurance trust or perhaps a partnership).
This technique (insuring a buy/sell agreement using a lower value and having the owners replace the "lost value" by acquiring life insurance outside of the buy/sell agreement and outside of the estate) can also be used when one co owner is not insurable or one co owner does not wish to acquire life insurance. It is critical to obtain the services of a certified valuation appraiser to ensure that the valuation used is both appropriate and defendable (if the IRS should question it).
Typically, the owner of the additional insurance is an Irrevocable Trust or partnership. Asset protection and estate tax avoidance are natural by-products (and additional benefits) of this design. This technique also allows the other co owners to acquire the needed life insurance on their own lives so that should they die before a complete lifetime exit, their families will receive the full value of their ownership interest.
When planning for the transfer of your ownership achieving valuation consistency is both necessary and attainable. The techniques described in this article can help you save income taxes (if there is a lifetime transfer) as well as estate taxes (if you exit the business unexpectedly).
As always, in this and all exit planning situations, you should use capable and experienced advisors to help you leave your business in style.
We are here to Help!
We strive to help business owners identify and prioritize their objectives with respect to their business, their employees, and their families. If you are ready to talk about your goals for the future and get insights into how you might achieve those goals, we’d be happy to sit down and talk with you. Please feel free to contact us at your convenience.
The information contained in this article is general in nature and is not legal, tax or financial advice. For information regarding your particular situation, contact an attorney or a tax or financial professional. The information in this newsletter is provided with the understanding that it does not render legal, accounting, tax or financial advice. In specific cases, clients should consult their legal, accounting, tax or financial professional. This article is not intended to give advice or to represent our firm as being qualified to give advice in all areas of professional services. Business Enterprise Institute, Inc. is a discipline that typically requires the collaboration of multiple professional advisors. To the extent that our firm does not have the expertise required on a particular matter, we will always work closely with you to help you gain access to the resources and professional advice that you need.
This is an opt-in newsletter published by Business Enterprise Institute, Inc., and presented to you by our firm. We appreciate your interest.
Any examples provided are hypothetical and for illustrative purposes only. Examples include fictitious names and do not represent any particular person or entity.